Wednesday 10th of March 2010 07:03:29 PM

MENU

#left {
position: absolute;
left: 0px;
width: 190px;
color: #564b47;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}

This column inherited it'b background color from the body definition. The padding ist defined through the p element.

CONTENT

3 columns / menu fixed, content dynamic with head and footer.
3 column layout grid. The navigation column are fixed in width, the content column is dynamic and adjusts itself to the browser window.

This layout also works with an absolute height template 100% height
more nice and free css templates

html {
padding:0px;
margin:0px;
}
body {
background-color: #e1ddd9;
font-size: 12px;
font-family: Verdana, Arial, SunSans-Regular, Sans-Serif;
color:#564b47;
padding:0px;
margin:0px;
}
#content {
margin: 0px 190px 0px 190px;
border-left: 2px solid #564b47;
border-right: 2px solid #564b47;
padding: 0px;
background-color: #ffffff;
}

in valid code we trust (*^_^*) miss monorom

of floated elements seems to support this interpretation. On theother hand, the CSS2 property z-index makes thisreasoning more complicated. As of this writing, implementations havenot yet advanced sufficiently to test this out, and the CSS2description of z-index doesn't really shedany light on this subject.

Ultimately, if you use negative margins, you may not get the sameresults from all browsers. Since no one can clearly say which isright, none of them can really be considered to be buggy -- at